Showing posts with label Misandry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Misandry. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Exposing A "Pernicious Ideology"

A rare woman indeed. (HT Barbarakay.ca)



Pictured above is Barbara Kay. She's one of the few women in Canada that I know of that speaks out against the "Pernicious Ideology" of radical feminism.

In this instance, she talks about how feminism has strong influence in the education and legal systems, as well as how men's value has been diminished.

The link below is to an engaging video that shows her exposing the feminarcissists corrosive worldview.

Background Intel:

YouTube: Barbara Kay on institutional feminism and misandry

Saturday, November 27, 2010

The Born Loser: Wife Feeds Husband Crap She Wouldn't feed A Dog

A loser of a comic strip. (HT WIkipedia)



Here's another glittering example of why newspapers are dead. This particular comic strip thinks a wife feeding her husband garbage leftovers is funny. If the genders were reversed, this comic strip wouldn't see the light of day. Self-misandry, disgusting!!

Background Intel:

Comics.com: The Born Loser

Sunday, July 18, 2010

Welcome To Adland, Where All Men Are Morons

What Ad campaigns think of Men. (HT Fotosearch.com)



This is conformation of what I've known for a long time now. From the Sydney Morning Herald:

"I have no doubt that women have historical and ongoing problems about their portrayal in advertising, particularly being sexually objectified. I remember such scandals as the sexist Windsor Smith shoe ads (pictured below), which showed women placed close to men's crotches as if about to perform a lewd act.



But along with the creeping sexualisation of women has come the creeping moronification of men. If the default position in advertising for women is sex object, then the default position for men is that of imbecile.

Men used to be depicted as heroic characters in ads, products being the rewards for their manly efforts. "You got to work it hard, to be a Solo man. You're gonna take the lead and let the others follow," crowed the voice-over as our champion braved rapids in a canoe to be rewarded with a frosty, refreshing Solo at the end. "You can get it walkin'! You can get it talkin! You can get it working a plough! Matter o' fact I've got it now! Victoria Bitter! . . ." went the beer ad, run along with images of hard-working men engaged in back-breaking, yet satisfying, endeavours, the VB being the prize for their labours.

Today's ads don't seem to give a tinker's cuss about the nobility of men's endeavours. Men are no longer heroes but consumers. Worse, they're idiots. They might as well be saying, "Hey, dickhead! We don't care about your job and who you are! You're a worthless, interchangeable cog in the capitalist system! Catch!" as a six-pack is hurtled towards some poor bloke's melon.

Just as the soul-destroying messages in women's magazines are crafted by their female staff, so too are the negative messages about men crafted overwhelming by men in advertising agencies. For some reason, they have deduced that delivering a psychic kick to men's testicles is the best way to sell a whole host of products.

"Darwin was right," our faceless adman might say, "men are descended from apes! APES!"

"So let's treat them as the knuckledraggers they are," his pony-tailed sidekick might respond.

So it goes. The evidence is everywhere."

A great example of this misandry is the latest round of Miller Lite beer commercials. I get more angry watching those than if a player on the team I'm rooting for makes a bad play. Way to insult your customers, especially since men consume 72.8% of beer in this country.

Background Intel:

Sydney Morning Herald: Welcome to adland, where all men are morons

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Misandry Files

The Feminarcissists Dream: A World Without Men. (HT John Ritter):



As you know father's Day is this Sunday. If radical feminists had their way, this would be wiped off the calendar because it celebrates the evil patriarchy.

The Atlanitc is one of many publications that glamourize single moms to wit:

"single moms tend to be more involved, set more rules, communicate better, and feel closer to their children than single dads. They have less difficulty monitoring their children’s whereabouts, friendships, and school progress. Their children do better on standardized tests and have higher grades, and teenagers of single moms are actually less likely to engage in delinquent behavior or substance abuse than those of single dads. Go, Murphy Brown."

This in spite of numerous studies that show that fatherless children are more likely to abuse drugs or fail academically. You don't want the fathers around, yet you want the child support. Are we just being a little hypocritical here?? Newsflash: It takes nore to raise a child that money. It also takes parental prescence, from Mothers AND Fathers.

Fathers are a valuable commodity, I've seen firsthand that the kids who have fathers in their lives are envied by the ones who don't. That's how a lot of mess gets started in school today.

Background Intel:

The Atlantic: Are Fathers Necessary?