Congress Trying To Create A Feminarcissist Czar

They're trying to go Global and dictate to women everywhere. (HT Exposing Feminism)



On top of everything else, the feminarcissists are trying to get a czar in the Obama administration complete with destructive powers. From Townhall.com:

"Based in the State Department, her statutory title will be "Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women's Issues." Her task will be to assure a "gender integration" perspective in all State Department policies and programs.

The breath-taking reach of her powers is openly stated in the bill's first section: "The Ambassador shall coordinate and advise, and where relevant lead -- (1) State Department activities and policies, including as they affect programs and funding relating to prevention and response, including gender integration and women's development internationally as relates to prevention and response."

And if that's not enough, the feminist ambassador will also be responsible for the "allocation of State Department resources" to carry out the mischief.

Reinforcing her ukases will be a "Women's Development Adviser" with a desk in the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). This is the same federal agency that sent millions to a radical feminist group in India called Women Power Connect, which used U.S. taxpayers' money to lobby for a 33 percent female quota in the Indian Parliament.

The vehicle for this latest pandering to the feminist left is the International Violence Against Women Act called I-VAWA (S.2982 and H.R.4594). The lead sponsors are Sens. John Kerry and Barbara Boxer.

The bill broadly defines violence against women to include nonviolent "psychological harm," "intimidation at work," and "psychological violence perpetrated or condoned by the government of the country in which the victim is a resident." Naturally, lots of taxpayers' money will be needed for so awesome a task, so the bill authorizes $1 billion over five years.

The feminist movement in the United States has never been only about changing laws alleged to be discriminatory. Feminists yearn to dictate norms and attitudes, too.

I-VAWA will provide "legal services for women," but not for men. According to the practice of our domestic Violence Against Women Act, which has been functioning in the United States since 1994, "legal services" are not just legal defense but also aggressive legal troublemaking, such as getting a restraining order to kick the husband out of the house.

If our State Department wants to help women in other countries, how about reporting to the American people about the atrocities against women committed by Muslim countries that use Shariah law. That includes forced marriages, child marriages, so-called "honor" murders, polygamy, and death by stoning as punishment for women who commit adultery.

The State Department could do something very useful by refusing to grant visas or immigrant status to anyone who supports Shariah punishments or genital mutilation of women. That would be an inexpensive way to stop a lot of violence against women."

Once again, Phyllis Schlafly is spot on. A feminarcissist czar will be on the march to destroy men, the family, and unborn babies. She will also nurture the disconnect and war between the sexes.

Background Intel:

Townhall.com: The Feminist Left Goes Global on Our Money

A Feminarcissist Myth Exposed.

Let the light of truth so shine. (HT Exposing Feminism)



Looks like the whining for men to do more around the house can fall on deaf ears. From the UK Telegraph:

"Wives who claim their husbands should help out more around the house because women work a "double shift" at the office and in the home are misguided, according to research.

If both paid work and unpaid duties such as housework, care and voluntary work are taken into account, husbands actually contribute more than their fair share to the household, experts found.

According to a study of how people use their time, men in Britain spend marginally longer on "productive" work each day than women.

While many wives scale back their working hours or drop out of employment after having children, husbands will often work overtime to earn more income for the family.

Couples who have no children at home and who both have full time jobs are the only group where women's overall workload is greater than men's, the survey reported.

Dr Catherine Hakim, who carried out the study, said: "This data overturns the well-entrenched theory that women work disproportional long hours in jobs and at home in juggling family and work.

"Feminists constantly complain that men are not doing their fair share of domestic work. The reality is that most men already do more than their fair share."

"One-sided policies that support employment and careers but ignore the productive work done in the family are, in effect, endorsing market place values over family values.

"Furthermore, there is evidence that men are beginning to demand the same options and choices as women, with more claims of sex discrimination from men. Policy-makers need to be aiming for gender-neutral policies."

In other words women should not get preferential treatment. For too long women have been allowed to be capitalists at work, but socialists away from work. What are the two pillars of socialism? Entitlements and redistribution of wealth, which in this case is from men to women. If men and women worked together instead of men working for women at work and at home, the world could be a happier place.

Background Intel:

UK Telegraph: Why men can shirk housework

Feminarcissist: Why I Love Chivalrous Guidos & Women Hitting Men Is Allowed

What men must steer clear. (HT Exposing Feminism)



Another Feminarcissist has revealed her true desires for the world to see. From The Frisky:

"I have a confession to make. I love the male cast members of MTV’s now media-saturated hit, “Jersey Shore.” I want to rub my hands over The Situation‘s abs and my fingers through Pauly D‘s hair. I want to giggle at nothing with Ronnie and hold Vinny’s hand as we stroll down the boardwalk. Ladies, listen up: guidos are catches!

I am anything but a mainstream dater. I’ve always secretly loved juiceheads, and been loved by them. Why? Because at their core, they are (Sammi?) sweethearts. Guidos operate on a code of chivalry, and I am a pro-chivalry feminist. After being shoved out of the way by businessmen for subway seats when I lived in Tokyo and being asked to buy my own drinks in New York for the past five years, I am hungry for guidos who place a high value on treating women like women. (More like a divine goddess. She's holding back.)

Hitting women is another thing—not allowed, a serious blow to the cultural code which is what made the fact that someone punched Snooki that much more shocking.

But women hitting men? That’s allowed. Are the women of the “Jersey Shore” feminists for fighting and physically demanding more of their men? Interestingly, J-Woww punched The Situation for not walking her home like a gentleman, when she obviously could defend herself. But the rule of protection still lives with guidos, and Mike violated that code. After being put in a cab after too many bad dates to remember, I’d take an old-school guido over a hipster any day."

So basically you want to be put on a pedastal and worshipped by a eunuch. Don't worry sweethart, there are plenty of those to make you happy.

Background Intel:

The Frisky: Girl Talk: Why I Prefer Dating Guidos A La “Jersey Shore”

UN Creates Potential Billion Dollar Feminarcissist Agency

Now more than ever. (HT Exposing Feminism):



It's a major coup for Feminarcissist groups, and a loss for men and women who are really suffering everywhere. About three weeks ago the UN General Assembly voted to consolidate four separate United Nations (UN) bodies dedicated to women’s issues into one new gender equality entity called “UN Women.” The resolution capped a victory for radical feminists who lobbied for years for the new entity and is the latest in an overall push to bring women’s issues even more onto the UN agenda.

From C-Fam.org:

"The Gender Equality Architecture Reform (GEAR) campaign, a coalition of radical feminist groups and abortion advocates, has relentlessly lobbied to create a UN super-agency to deal with women’s issues. Charlotte Bunch, executive director of the Centre for Women's Global Leadership and the leading advocate of the GEAR campaign, said, “We have high expectations for this new agency [...] The coalition of women’s groups and other social justice, human rights and development organizations that played a pivotal role in this effort will now turn its efforts toward ensuring that the new body has the human and financial resources necessary to succeed.”

Wendy Wright, President of Concerned Women of America, told the Friday Fax, "Women need respect and opportunity, not a global agency demanding money and power for its well-heeled elitist leaders. The money would be better spent going directly to the areas and people in need with programs that have proven to work, not to another agency to empower the people who run it."

Wendy Wright nails it. This is only about empowering Charlotte Bunch and others in her elitist clique, and enslaving as many of those who aren't, especially men. Socialists are socialists first, foremost, and always. Never forget that.

Background Intel:

C-Fam.org: UN Creates What May Become a Billion Dollar Agency for Radical Feminism